
The curiosities of antiparallelism
In elementary geometry, proportionality often involves parallel lines, through the intercept theorem. But there are also antiparallel lines. Might there likewise be such a thing as "antiproportionality"?


In elementary geometry, proportionality often involves parallel lines, through the intercept theorem. But there are also antiparallel lines. Might there likewise be such a thing as "antiproportionality"?


Articles recommended for you.

The notion of power defined with respect to a circle naturally leads to the notions of inversion and polars. These pedagogical tools, which have vanished from school curricula, are central to the birth of the concept of duality and of representations of non-Euclidean geometry.

Many proofs in elementary geometry rely on proportionality. Almost all of geometry’s classic theorems involve it: Thales, Ptolemy, Menelaus, Ceva, Pappus… Here is a brief tour of these great problems.

Proportionality often brings to mind the rule of three—in other words, a method of calculation. Yet the concept first emerged in geometry, through the study of similar figures, a cornerstone of many theorems that gave rise to the idea of incommensurable quantities.

The Greek mathematician, geographer and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy discovered a theorem about quadrilaterals inscribed in a circle in the second century CE. His result is certainly far less famous than that of his compatriot Pythagoras, but it is every bit as beautiful.
Discussion
Sign in to post a comment and talk with other readers.
No comments yet. Be the first to respond.