The notion of power defined with respect to a circle naturally leads to the notions of inversion and polars. These pedagogical tools, which have vanished from school curricula, are central to the birth of the concept of duality and of representations of non-Euclidean geometry.
For a ray from a point O that intersects a circle (C) at points A and B, the product PC(O)=OA×OB defines the power of the point O with respect to the circle (C). This notion can be simply defined using that of the inscribed angle and the age-old theorem of Thales. It was while studying it that Jakob Steiner discovered, only in 1824, inversion, a transformation all of whose elements had nevertheless been known since Euclid.
Inversion, the other theme
--------------------------
An inversion i with pole O is, like reflections, an involutive transformation, that is, such that i composed with itself is the identity. It maps every point M other than the pole O to its image, or corresponding point, M' = i(M) on the line (OM) such that OM×OM’=k, where k is a given real number.
Because of the obvious analogy between this expression and that of the power of a point, the constant k is called the power of the inversion.
The circle (C) with center O and radius ∣k∣=OT, called the circle of inversion, is pointwise invariant and is the boundary between the interior and exterior points exchanged by the inversion. Every point N of segment [IB] will have image P = i (N) in segment [IA], and conversely N = i (P).