
In the classroom in the 1960s
In the 1960s curriculum, geometric transformations were studied in some depth. These included, of course, translations (covered in the French seconde, equivalent to tenth grade) and the group they formed.


In the 1960s curriculum, geometric transformations were studied in some depth. These included, of course, translations (covered in the French seconde, equivalent to tenth grade) and the group they formed.


Articles recommended for you.

The notion of power defined with respect to a circle naturally leads to the notions of inversion and polars. These pedagogical tools, which have vanished from school curricula, are central to the birth of the concept of duality and of representations of non-Euclidean geometry.

In elementary geometry, proportionality often involves parallel lines, through the intercept theorem. But there are also antiparallel lines. Might there likewise be such a thing as "antiproportionality"?

Euclid's Elements, the standard reference for centuries, established straightedge-and-compass proof as the norm in geometry. But many problems involving circles tangent to one another become simpler when using conics or transformations, such as the indispensable inversion.

The Greek mathematician, geographer and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy discovered a theorem about quadrilaterals inscribed in a circle in the second century CE. His result is certainly far less famous than that of his compatriot Pythagoras, but it is every bit as beautiful.
Discussion
Sign in to post a comment and talk with other readers.
No comments yet. Be the first to respond.