In reality, such weights would produce nothing very harmonious: they would need to be 1, 4, 9, and 16 to yield the octave (a doubling of the fundamental frequency), the fifth (whose ratio to the fundamental frequency is 3 to 2, or 1.5), and the fourth (whose ratio to the fundamental frequency is 4 to 3). The frequency of a vibrating string with a mass suspended from it is proportional to the square root of the mass, not to the mass itself, as all these ancient texts assumed. In the 17
th century, Huygens, who took a keen interest in music, corrected the weights accordingly (see Christiaan Huygens's
Œuvres complètes (Complete Works), Société hollandaise des sciences, 1937, vol. XIX, and
les Représentations de la propagation du son d’Aristote à l’Encyclopédie,
François Baskevitch's doctoral dissertation, 2008). Although the experiment described by ancient historians and mathematicians is inaccurate, they all nevertheless report an iterative method for defining a twelve-note musical scale: the
Pythagorean scale. It may not have been used by Pythagoras himself, but probably by disciples of the Pythagorean school, Archytas and Philolaus, and remained the scale shared by all musicians until equal temperament emerged in the Baroque era.