

Can a game in which one player's gain is the other's loss benefit both players? That was the question Martin Gardner posed in 1980 with his "Loser Takes All" problem. More than forty years on, the paradox remains as relevant as ever!



Articles recommended for you.

Expected payoff is essential to rational decision-making, but tricky to use. Many paradoxes arise from misinterpreting what it represents. Casinos—and the unscrupulous people who encourage you to wager your money—understand this only too well...

A paradox can sometimes resemble an urban legend. First, its precise origins may be difficult to pin down; second, over time it may become distorted, change form, and proliferate. Such is the case with the two-envelope paradox.

Toward the end of the Second World War, the celebrated mathematician John von Neumann and the economist Oskar Morgenstern broke new ground by providing a mathematical foundation for the strategic behavior of players and economic agents.

Faced with a lottery offering two different prizes, people adopt different strategies. Why do some participants prefer a potential prize that is not the largest? Their choices depend on how each person conceives of probability—whether as a one-off event or one that will be repeated.
Discussion
Sign in to post a comment and talk with other readers.
No comments yet. Be the first to respond.