Condorcet's paradox explained | Tangente
Condorcet's paradox
From Lewis Carroll to Kenneth Arrow, the famous Condorcet paradox has generated a great deal of discussion.

From Lewis Carroll to Kenneth Arrow, the famous Condorcet paradox has generated a great deal of discussion.

Articles recommended for you.

Condorcet is recognized as one of the pioneers in the theory of electoral systems, alongside his contemporary, the Chevalier de Borda. Both thinkers brought a fundamental idea to light: the method used to elect a candidate has a decisive influence on the outcome.

Arrow's classic impossibility theorem has often been invoked in political theory to demonstrate the irrationality of democracy. But is this result truly relevant to political science? Let's also revisit some of the mathematical arguments used in the epistemic theory of democracy.

Public policies are often supported by rational, even mathematical arguments. Philosophers such as Leibniz, Condorcet and Bentham sought, through a variety of approaches, to put both economic and social behavior on a mathematical footing. Yet they all came up against the fact that combining individual rationalities does not necessarily serve the common good.

Throughout history and across civilizations, chance has fascinated people. Although betting was not conceptualized until the 15th and 16th centuries, it had already attracted many enthusiasts. Strategies were devised. But can they be adapted to presidential elections?
Discussion
Sign in to post a comment and talk with other readers.
No comments yet. Be the first to respond.